Os rapaces non son armas arroxadizas
Non quería falar deste tema polo momento porque quería pensar ben os argumentos, pero Daniel ponme en contacto con esta información.
Hai dúas cousas que teño claras.
1. Protexer ós nenos: SI.
2. Censurar a información e limitar a liberdade de expresión: NON.
Súmome a estas palabras:
The Internet has proliferated as both a technically and a socially distributed system where many computers and other pieces of equipment can be connected and where various individuals and groups can participate in a personal manner. By fully utilizing the characteristics of digital technology, becoming indispensible infrastructure. The best way to tackle problems in this distributed system is to do it in a distributed manner. If a central entity tackles those problems in a uniform way, it might lead to loss of advantages of digital technology or distributed systems themselves.
We cannot expect minors to learn if we do not solve problems surrounding them where the problems arise.
If we are to think that sound rearing of minors will be achieved by the central force that silences information and controls inputs for the minors, it would mean that we are neglecting the power of families, the power of education and the power of industries. Should this be realized, the power of families, education and industries in this country will continue to be lost.
It should be our principle that problems are to be solved where they arise.
Otherwise, the people of Japan will not be able to competitively survive in the world by improving their problem-solving abilities as the global environment in the 21st century changes rapidly. WIDE
chuzame - 
